Midair Collision · NTSB CEN10FA115
CIRRUS DESIGN CORP SR20 — Boulder, CO
| Date | February 6, 2010 |
| Location | Boulder, CO |
| Aircraft | CIRRUS DESIGN CORP SR20 |
| Purpose of flight | Personal |
| Conditions | Day · Visual Meteorological Cond |
| Phase / occurrence | Enroute Midair collision |
| Pilot age | 58 |
| Pilot total time | 640 hrs · Building experience |
| Time in type | 359 hrs |
| Fatalities | 3 |
Probable cause
NTSB findings
- Personnel issues-Psychological-Attention/monitoring-Monitoring other aircraft-Pilot - C
- Environmental issues-Operating environment-(general)-(general)-Contributed to outcome - F
What happened
While conducting glider-tow operations, the right wing of a Piper PA-25 was struck at a 90 degree angle by a Cirrus SR20. Analysis of the radar information, the flight condition of both airplanes, and the pilots' visibility in their respective cockpit configurations, suggests that until just prior to the impact, the Piper would have been located below the horizon and against the background of the surrounding terrain and city, between the 10 and 11 o’clock position of the Cirrus pilot. The Piper remained in this same relative position in the windscreen of the Cirrus pilot for the entire duration of its 7 minute flight. The Cirrus would have been above the horizon, against the white overcast sky, in about the 1 to 2 o’clock position of the Piper pilot. The Cirrus would have only appeared in this position after the Piper pilot completed the last turn and was headed to the west, which would have been (at most) the last 3 minutes of the flight.
Visual meteorological conditions existed at the time of the accident with an overcast layer and visibility of 8 miles. The overcast sky conditions likely made it difficult for the Piper pilot to detect the primarily white-colored Cirrus. The lack of maneuvering, as observed by the glider pilot prior to the accident, suggests that neither the pilot of the Cirrus nor the pilot of the Piper observed the other airplane prior to the accident. If the Piper pilot had observed the Cirrus prior to the impact, his ability to maneuver to avoid an impact would have been severely limited due to the glider in tow.
A postaccident examination of the engine and flight control systems on both airplanes revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have prevented either pilot from maneuvering to avoid an impact. Medical and pathological examination of both pilots revealed no medical or toxicological issues that would have precluded either pilot from operating their airplane in a safe manner prior to the accident.