VFR into IMC · NTSB CEN10FA316

PIPER PA-28-181 — Umpire, AR

4 fatal Low-time pilotIMC
DateJune 13, 2010
LocationUmpire, AR
AircraftPIPER PA-28-181
Purpose of flightPersonal
ConditionsDay · Instrument Meteorological Cond
Phase / occurrenceUncontrolled descent Collision with terr/obj (non-CFIT)
Pilot age45
Pilot total time159 hrs · Low time
Time in type143 hrs
Fatalities4

Probable cause

The pilot’s continued visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in spatial disorientation.

NTSB findings

  • Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C
  • Personnel issues-Psychological-Perception/orientation/illusio-Spatial disorientation-Pilot - C
  • Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Wing structure-(general)-Failure
  • Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Total instrument experience-Pilot
  • Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Ceiling/visibility/precip-Low ceiling-Contributed to outcome
  • Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Ceiling/visibility/precip-Haze/smoke-Contributed to outcome
  • Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot - C

What happened

According to a witness, the non-instrument-rated pilot departed when the weather was overcast at 3,000 feet and the surrounding mountain ridges were obscured. An airport located about 32 miles north of the departure airport, in the direction of travel, was reporting slightly lower ceilings. The pilot requested winds aloft for 3,000 and 6,000 feet, stating, “I need to be at about fifty five hundred probably to be safe,” adding “there’s some three thousand foot tops of some...terrain there in places.” He was likely referring to a mountain range that he would have been approaching about the time of the accident. Thus, the pilot likely intended to climb above the altitude of the reported cloud base, and, therefore, he most likely did enter the clouds. No radar data was available for the flight, and there were no eyewitnesses to the accident; however, a witness reported hearing a low flying airplane followed by the sound of an impact. A postaccident examination revealed that the left wing spar had fractured in upward bending as a result of overload; the bottom cap failed in tension. The examination did not disclose any preimpact mechanical problems with the airplane. Federal Aviation Administration guidance indicates that if neither horizon nor surface references exist, the attitude of an airplane must be determined by artificial means from the flight instruments. Further, during periods of low visibility, the supporting senses sometimes conflict with what is seen; when this happens, a pilot is particularly vulnerable to disorientation. The pilot did not possess an instrument rating, which, coupled with the low visibility as he entered the clouds, would have made him vulnerable to spatial disorientation.

An editorial "what led to it / how to avoid it" analysis for this accident is generated separately and will appear here.

View the official NTSB docket →