Mechanical & Engine Failure · NTSB ERA09FA029

PIPER PA-24 — Red Hill, VA

2 fatal High-time pilotNight
DateOctober 24, 2008
LocationRed Hill, VA
AircraftPIPER PA-24
Purpose of flightPersonal
ConditionsNight · Visual Meteorological Cond
Phase / occurrencePrior to flight Aircraft maintenance event
Pilot age47
Pilot total time1,070 hrs · Experienced
Time in typeUnknown
Fatalities2

Probable cause

The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control due to an improper repair to the stabilator, which resulted in an in-flight failure of the stabilator. Contributing to the accident was the descent in turbulence, at airspeeds above the maximum structural cruise speed.

NTSB findings

  • Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Empennage structure-Horizontal stabilizer-Incorrect service/maintenance - C
  • Aircraft-Aircraft structures-Empennage structure-Horizontal stabilizer-Failure - C
  • Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C

What happened

The flight was being operated on an instrument flight rules flight plan. About 6 minutes prior to the accident, the flight was cleared to descend from its cruise altitude of 7,000 feet. About 2 minutes after the descent clearance was issued, the owner/pilot requested a diversion to a different airport, due to low visibility at the original destination. The request was approved, a heading change to 360 degrees was issued, and about 4 minutes later, the airplane departed controlled flight, and impacted terrain. A performance study revealed that after the airplane left its cruise altitude, it initially descended at a calibrated airspeed of approximately 178 mph. Once the pilot completed the diversion turn, the airspeed increased to values that ranged between 190 and 196 mph. Examination of the wreckage revealed that the two stabilators had deformed and separated prior to impact, and that one stabilator had been improperly repaired with incorrect fasteners. A review of the certification, service, and maintenance information indicated that the airplane's original maximum structural cruise speed of 180 mph was still applicable; the airplane was not to be operated above this speed except in smooth air. A weather analysis indicated moderate to severe turbulence in the vicinity of the flight track.

An editorial "what led to it / how to avoid it" analysis for this accident is generated separately and will appear here.

View the official NTSB docket →