VFR into IMC · NTSB ERA10LA007

CASE RICHARD L VAN RV-6 — Magnolia, NC

1 fatal Low-time pilotIMC
DateOctober 5, 2009
LocationMagnolia, NC
AircraftCASE RICHARD L VAN RV-6 (amateur-built)
Purpose of flightPersonal
ConditionsDay · Instrument Meteorological Cond
Phase / occurrenceEnroute Loss of control in flight
Pilot age62
Pilot total time270 hrs · Low time
Time in type30 hrs
Fatalities1

Probable cause

The pilot's continued visual flight into instrument meterological conditions and his subsequent failure to maintain aircraft control. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's inadequate preflight evaluation of the weather.

NTSB findings

  • Personnel issues-Task performance-Use of equip/info-Aircraft control-Pilot - C
  • Personnel issues-Task performance-Planning/preparation-Weather planning-Pilot - F
  • Personnel issues-Action/decision-Action-Incorrect action performance-Pilot - C
  • Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-(general)-Not attained/maintained - C
  • Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Ceiling/visibility/precip-Below VFR minima-Effect on operation - C

What happened

The non-instrument-rated pilot was on a visual-flight-rules flight when he contacted air traffic control and stated that he was "in the thick of the weather." Air traffic control subsequently observed the airplane on radar at 1,500 feet, circling, before being lost off of radar. A witness reported that it was raining heavily when he noticed an airplane spinning out of the clouds toward the ground. The recorded weather near the accident site about the time of the accident included: winds from 020 degrees at 7 knots, visibility of 7 miles in light rain, with a ceiling of 300 feet broken, 2,500 feet broken, 7,000 feet overcast. According to Air Traffic Control Service personnel there were no records of any communication with the flight service station or entries made in the direct user access terminal system (DUATS) prior to pilot's flight. Examination of the aircraft structure, flight controls, systems, and engine by an FAA inspector showed no evidence of precrash failure or malfunction.

An editorial "what led to it / how to avoid it" analysis for this accident is generated separately and will appear here.

View the official NTSB docket →