Undetermined · NTSB ERA11FA102

CESSNA 310F — Orange, MA

1 fatal NightBase-to-final turn
DateJanuary 1, 2011
LocationOrange, MA
AircraftCESSNA 310F
Purpose of flightPersonal
ConditionsNight · Visual Meteorological Cond
Phase / occurrenceApproach-VFR pattern final Altitude deviation
Pilot age56
Pilot total time500 hrs · Building experience
Time in type50 hrs
Fatalities1

Probable cause

The pilot did not maintain separation from trees during landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s inadequate preflight planning and lack of recent night flight experience.

NTSB findings

  • Personnel issues-Action/decision-(general)-(general)-Pilot - C
  • Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Recent experience-Pilot - F
  • Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Light condition-Low light-Effect on personnel
  • Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Ceiling/visibility/precip-Haze/smoke-Effect on personnel
  • Personnel issues-Experience/knowledge-Experience/qualifications-Qualification/certification-Pilot
  • Personnel issues-Task performance-Planning/preparation-Flight planning/navigation-Pilot - F

What happened

The pilot and passenger were on a pleasure flight in the multi-engine airplane and at the last moment the pilot decided to conduct a touch-and-go landing and takeoff at a nearby airport. During a short final leg of the landing approach, the pilot recalled seeing white and red lights on the left side of the runway and believed these were visual approach slope indicator lights. He was uncertain of what light color arrangement indicated a proper glide path to the runway. As the airplane approached the runway, the lights started to flicker, at which time the pilot applied full engine power, but the airplane immediately collided with trees and came to rest inverted. The pilot stated that there was less ambient light than he had anticipated and that there was haze in the air. He was not aware of the trees at the approach end of the runway. The airport was not tower controlled and none of the 4 runways were equipped with visual approach slope indicator lights. The intended landing runway has a published displaced threshold that is 850 feet from the runway’s original threshold. Published information cautions about trees at the approach end of that runway. The pilot did not review any publication for the intended airport before the flight. Additionally, the pilot did not hold a multi-engine rating or a multi-engine solo endorsement. The last entry in his flight logbooks for night flight was in 2000. The pilot reported no mechanical issues with the airplane before the accident.

An editorial "what led to it / how to avoid it" analysis for this accident is generated separately and will appear here.

View the official NTSB docket →