Controlled Flight Into Terrain · NTSB WPR13FA201
CESSNA 182D — Wellington, NV
| Date | April 15, 2013 |
| Location | Wellington, NV |
| Aircraft | CESSNA 182D |
| Purpose of flight | Personal |
| Conditions | Night/Dark · Visual Meteorological Cond |
| Phase / occurrence | Enroute-descent Controlled flight into terr/obj (CFIT) |
| Pilot age | 30 |
| Pilot total time | 1,266 hrs · Experienced |
| Time in type | Unknown |
| Fatalities | 2 |
Probable cause
NTSB findings
- Personnel issues-Psychological-Attention/monitoring-Monitoring environment-Pilot - C
- Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Light condition-Dark-Effect on personnel
- Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Mountainous/hilly terrain-Awareness of condition
What happened
The airplane was approaching the destination airport in night, visual meteorological conditions. When the airplane was about 44 miles from the destination airport, which was located at an elevation of 4,722 ft mean sea level (msl) in a valley, the pilot contacted an approach air traffic controller and cancelled visual flight rules (VFR) flight-following services. No further communications were received from the pilot.
Radar data showed that, at the time that the pilot cancelled flight-following services, the airplane was at an altitude of 11,800 feet msl. The radar track continued in a steady descent; the last radar return showed the airplane at 10,300 ft msl, 10 miles southeast of the accident site and directly in line with the destination airport. The accident site was located on a southeast-facing slope of a mountain about 200 ft below the top of the ridgeline. The airplane impacted terrain in a wings-level attitude, and a postimpact fire ensued. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot was descending the airplane at night over rural, mountainous terrain that provided few visual ground reference references; therefore, it is likely that he did not see the rising terrain as the airplane continued toward its final destination, which was at a lower altitude. Although there were reports of turbulence in the region and possible downdrafts near the accident site, the attitude of the airplane at impact is consistent with controlled flight into terrain.