Low-Altitude Maneuvering · NTSB WPR23FA223
COMPAGNIE DAHER TB 30 EPSILON — Apache Junction, AZ
| Date | June 10, 2023 |
| Location | Apache Junction, AZ |
| Aircraft | COMPAGNIE DAHER TB 30 EPSILON |
| Purpose of flight | Personal |
| Conditions | Day · Visual Meteorological Cond |
| Phase / occurrence | Maneuvering-low-alt flying Low altitude operation/event |
| Pilot age | 46 |
| Pilot total time | 575 hrs · Building experience |
| Time in type | 250 hrs |
| Fatalities | 2 |
Probable cause
NTSB findings
- Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot
- Personnel issues-Action/decision-Info processing/decision-Decision making/judgment-Pilot of other aircraft
- Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Light condition-(general)-Effect on personnel
- Aircraft-Aircraft oper/perf/capability-Performance/control parameters-Altitude-Not attained/maintained
- Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Mountainous/hilly terrain-Awareness of condition
- Environmental issues-Physical environment-Terrain-Mountainous/hilly terrain-Ability to respond/compensate
What happened
The formation of three airplanes departed about 2 hrs and 20 minutes after sunrise to fly to an airport for lunch. The accident airplane was loaded with the pilot and a passenger, a full load of fuel, and an undetermined amount of baggage when they took off. The accident pilot, flying in the No. 2 position, intended to continue flying a solo cross-country after lunch. The flight planned to fly at low altitude around a local mountainous area en route to the lunch location. The No. 3 pilot reported that, during departure and before flying around the mountains, the accident airplane was having difficulty keeping up with the other two airplanes.
Several witnesses observed the airplanes flying to the south along the west side of the mountains at a low altitude. They reported that the lead and No. 2 airplanes were close together, flying similar profiles, while the No. 3 airplane was further behind.
Both pilots reported they struggled with depth perception when flying around the mountains. The No. 3 pilot reported that just before the accident, he observed the No. 2 airplane pass under his airplane from right to left toward the terrain. The nose of the airplane pitched up and down several times, but the trajectory of the airplane did not appear to change. He said the pilot of the No. 2 airplane did not make any radio calls or report any problems before the accident.
A home security camera, facing east, captured the moment the No. 2 airplane impacted terrain. No airplanes were identifiable in the video. The video showed the west facing slopes of the mountains were shadowed and terrain features were not defined.
It is possible the airplane was not performing as well as the other two airplanes due to its loading, but the evidence was insufficient to say whether that could have been a factor in the pilot’s ability to avoid the terrain. The evidence is consistent with the shadowing effects resulting from the positioning of the sun creating depth perception difficulties for the pilot. The pilot likely failed to recognize the significance of rising terrain in front of the airplane until there was insufficient time to avoid it, resulting in controlled flight into terrain. Contributing to the accident was the decision by all three pilots to fly at a low altitude around the mountainous terrain.